A recent study shows that living in a high-income neighborhood, having private medical health insurance and age increase the likelihood that life support will likely be removed for individuals who have suffered a severe brain bleed.
Led by researchers at Recent York University’s Grossman School of Medicine, the study focused on the social and economic aspects related to withdrawal of life support and related death after hospitalization for intracerebral hemorrhage. Such bleeding, sometimes called a hemorrhagic stroke, often results in brain swelling that may put the patient right into a coma and infrequently even death.
Previous studies have found racial and spiritual disparities in death rates from such hemorrhages, with higher rates observed amongst black and Hispanic patients and patients with deeply held religious beliefs.
The study’s authors discuss their recent work, published within the journal Neurology online, Jan. 18, is vital since it provides a greater understanding of disparities that may help physicians tailor end-of-life conversations with patients’ families to handle age, racial and economic disparities in health care.
Unlike ischemic stroke, which is attributable to blockage of blood vessels that could be unblocked in lots of cases, hemorrhagic strokes are more often fatal. Some hemorrhagic stroke patients may undergo surgery to reduce the consequences of swelling. Nonetheless, generally, recovery is restricted and plenty of patients require life-sustaining assistance with respiration and feeding. For these reasons, many patients and their families resolve to disconnect life support.
For the brand new study, researchers reviewed the medical records of 868 patients admitted to 3 NYU Langone Health hospitals in Manhattan, Brooklyn and Long Island with intracerebral hemorrhage between 2017 and 2022. Most were seniors and men of all races, and half were on Medicare and one in five were on Medicaid. Although many survived major cerebral hemorrhage and were discharged home to a rehabilitation or nursing facility, 148 didn’t survive, and most of those that died (84%) had their life support devices, including respirators and feeding tubes, removed during their hospital stay.
The researchers found that hemorrhagic stroke patients living in higher-income city neighborhoods (i.e., above the annual median of $88,687) were as much as 88% more more likely to have their life support removed and subsequently die in comparison with patients living in poorer neighborhoods. cities. (i.e. with a mean annual income of lower than $70,784). Being older than 77 and on Medicare also increases your risk of ending life support.
In turn, being black and having private insurance were aspects related to a lower likelihood of getting life support removed. Amongst hospitalized hemorrhagic stroke patients, blacks made up 7% of those that had life support removed but accounted for 18% of those that were on life support. Similarly, although 37% had private medical health insurance, only 20% of those that selected to withdraw life support had private insurance.
Other study results showed that amongst Christians, especially Catholics, the danger of getting life support removed after a stroke was 10% greater than that of being disconnected, and that Jewish patients were 15% more more likely to be kept on life support than to be disconnected.
The outcomes of our study highlight the various complex social, economic, religious and racial aspects that will play a job in decision-making after a patient suffers a severe brain bleed or hemorrhagic stroke and dies after life support is withdrawn.”
Kara Melmed, MD, Principal Investigator and Neurologist
Melmed, a clinical assistant professor within the departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery at Recent York University Langone, says that while it has long been known that socioeconomic aspects play a job in health and the way well people get better, the role of those aspects, beyond religion and race, haven’t yet been studied intimately in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.
Researchers say more research is required because death is way more common in hemorrhagic strokes than in ischemic strokes.
Stroke of all sorts in the USA isn’t only the leading reason behind death, but additionally a health care disparity problem, with strokes occurring twice as often in black people than in non-black people.
“Knowing that socioeconomic aspects, especially income, play a job in hemorrhagic stroke outcomes is step one in understanding why these imbalances exist and the way best to handle them to make health care more equitable,” said the senior researcher and neurologist Jennifer Frontera, MD.
“It’s concerning to see any disparities in health care,” said Frontera, a professor within the Department of Neurology at Recent York University Langone. “Clinicians might have to adapt discussions about end-of-life care in the longer term to keep in mind cultural and social aspects when treating patients who’ve had an intracerebral hemorrhage, especially the difficulty of disconnection of life support.”
Along with Melmed and Frontera, other NYU Langone investigators involved on this study, which was self-funded by the health care system, included: Ariane Lewis, MD; Lindsey Kuohn, MD; Joanna Marmo, BSN, RN, SCRN; Nirmala Rossan-Raghunath, MSN, SCRN; Jose Torres, M.D.; Rajanandini Muralidharan, MD; Aaron Lord, M.D.; and Koto Ishida, MD.
Source:
Magazine number:
Melmed, K.R., et al. (2024) Association of neighborhood socioeconomic status with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000208039.